inafoxhole (inafoxhole) wrote,
inafoxhole
inafoxhole

Assumptions

There is a story emerging the press recently about how King Herod's grave has supposedly been discovered. The whole way the story is being presented is incredibly irritating. Look at this opening paragraph from the Guardian article above.

Archaeologists have unearthed the grave of King Herod the Great, the ruler of Jerusalem who attempted to kill Jesus soon after his birth, it was announced today.

Notice the assumption being made? That the Bible is historical fact and that they are just trying to verify it. As is finding the tomb of King Herod is proof of the Bible's veracity. Completely ignoring the fact that just because King Herod existed, does not mean that he did any of the things that the Bible says he did, including trying to kill Jesus.

The sentence, in all scientific objectivity, should say:

Archaeologists have unearthed the grave of King Herod the Great, the ruller of Jerusalem who, according to the Bible, attempted to kill Jesus soon after his birth, it was announced today.

Four words. That's all it needed. Four words to get around that nasty Christo-centric assumption.
Tags: assumptions, biblical history, links
Subscribe

  • circumcision

    It was almost two years ago that my nephew was born. There were a lot of things about that experience that I disapproved of--thought, my newphew…

  • The Ledge

    It seems like I dropped off the face of the Earth for a while. I'm afraid that's what happens when I have too many things going on. I'm doing a…

  • Science literacy in America

    I originally intended this blog to discuss mostly atheism, but it's become a lot about science as well. I considered whether or not to post this…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 1 comment