And again, a section about how only one person can read and translate the book, and no one else may even see it. That seems awfully convenient; actually, it reminds me of a charlatan. I have special knowledge which I cannot teach you, and can't reproduce, and I can't reveal how I know. How long do you think that would go over in math class?
It's also a little strange that the Nephites are supposed to be favoured of god, and yet they were utterly destroyed. Rather contradictory, considering the old testament. Of course, for those of us familiar with the standard bible, it's a little surprising at just how incredibly non-factual this is... Even more than what I'm used to. This book makes factual claims that are clearly falsifiable, like the alleged genetic relationship between Jews and Native Americans, and only 2600 years separated.
Something else interesting, is that this book also talks about how there should be no "priestcraft" as it is a way for one man to take advantage of others. Is this passage telling me there are no priests/ministers of Mormonism? That doesn't seem likely. Who keeps the temples and does marriages and all that? So you have to be a prophet? But then after Nephi dies, Jacob, in his book, speaks immediately of priests...?
Jacob 4 starts out hysterically... How many verses about how much effort it is to write are consumed by whining about how he can't write all his words on plates because it's so hard to write on plates?!
Oh, I almost forgot, my fave part from the drive in was when in 2 Nephi, Nephi was foreseeing the destruction of the Nephites. He speaks of using people as logs on a fire, and that the people will turn on each other and eat each other and then eat even the flesh of their own arms... Lovely imagery. The follow-up parable of the vineyard in Jacob 5? Strikes me as being connected to the proceeding prophesy, and I question it's biological veracity. I mean, really, if you are going to use parable to say something profound, don't you think you should at least get the biology right?
I've noticed something curious about the sections where prophesy is made: there are often little asides that refer back to the book of Isiah. This is a clever tactic to try to transfer whatecer respect a Christian might have for the old testament and its "predictions" of Jesus.