inafoxhole (inafoxhole) wrote,

Akron City Council abandons Lord's Prayer

Akron responds to litigation threat.

What always surprises me about such articles is that they describe the practice as a "long-standing tradition" or the like. But surely if it's that long-standing it was around when the Supreme Court rulings came down. I'd be pretty confident in asserting that these rulings were publicized, so they kept up the prayer despite knowing it was unconstitutional... that's the only conclusion that I can come to. Why? These rulings were decades ago. Why are we still trying to stamp out these "long-standing traditions"?? And why does it take a threat of a lawsuit to make them comply with the law?
Tags: links, ohio, separation of church and state

  • New Testament...part 3?

    Picking up from yesterday, the second leg of the trip... This is still acts of the apostles. My guess with Paul and his vision, is that he was…

  • New Testament...part 2?

    So, the continuing saga of Haysoos continues... The new testament has its problems, of course, but it's not as engaging as the old testament, and I…

  • Denialism

    I recently finished listening to two audiobooks. One was Bertrand Russell's What I Believe, which was a collection of three essays/talks he'd given.…

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded